Accordion’s report revealed a lack of alignment between sponsors and CFOs on goals for an IPO. For sponsors, “IPO readiness is increasingly viewed as an extension of exit readiness,” report author Shauna Watson, head of the IPO readiness practice at Accordion, wrote, and want to see it “embedded into the operating model.” CFOs, on the other hand, view preparing for an IPO as something they only do once a clear direction has been set, according to Watson.
Sponsors also envisioned a more aggressive IPO timeline than CFOs did. On average, sponsors believed a company should go public six to 12 months after making the decision to do so. CFOs, on the other hand, estimated a timeline twice as long: one to two years.
The disconnect may come from the fact that CFOs have greater insight into workload, constraints, and governance, Watson wrote. (Or perhaps, like Star Trek’s Mr. Scott, they want to be seen as miracle workers.)
And only around 30% of the CFOs said their financial reporting was ready for the scrutiny that comes with going public. Just 25% were “very confident” they could prepare for an IPO without interrupting day-to-day operations.
CFOs and sponsors also disagreed on who in the company they think should “own” the IPO-readiness process.
Around two-thirds of sponsors (65%) thought that CFOs were responsible for the process, but only 15% of CFOs shared that opinion. Over half of CFOs (55%) thought IPO readiness is a task they share with boards, while just 25% of sponsors viewed it as a shared responsibility.